 Robin Field, the Peter Pan of Reason
by Rodney Rawlings
Robin Field’s many-faceted background in light entertainment—vaudeville, impressions, acting, pantomime, radio, theater, cartooning, puppetry, and ventriloquism—makes him a fitting representative of that joyous, benevolent American sense of life which Objectivism defends. And the persona he portrays in Three Questions: A Philosophical Oratorio is like nothing so much as Disney’s Peter Pan: “fearless, laughing, confident, able, free, independent, victorious.” (Read more...)
Discuss this Article (9 messages)
 667; or, How Objectivists Are Not Materialists
by Rodney Rawlings
Some thinkers have charged that Objectivism is a materialist philosophy in spite of itself, since it sees the world exclusively in terms of reason. In a thread titled “The Number of the Beast,” the poster “Citizen Rat” put forth an articulate version of this viewpoint. He also suggested that to escape such a soulless, deterministic worldview Objectivists should leave open the possibility of God’s existence and recognize that toleration of religious principles can be expedient in moving us all closer to a capitalistic society. The present essay addresses the charge of materialism with a special focus on various aspects of Citizen Rat’s argument. (Read more...)
Discuss this Article (24 messages)
"Errors of Modern Science" - A Philosophical Magic Act
by Rodney Rawlings
It all began with Ed Sullivan. In my early teens I used to watch his show regularly, and one day it included a tuxedoed magician who seemingly pulled colored hankies, billiard balls, and even entire decks of cards out of thin air. Much later, I would develop a theory that it is those who are most used to understanding the world who are most intrigued by a magic act. This was true in my case: I, who loved nature and thought I might one day be a scientist, was mesmerized. (Read more...)
Discuss this Article (11 messages)
Evaluating Music -- and Franz Lehar
by Rodney Rawlings
The title of this article might make some modern intellectuals scoff. They hold the subjectivist theories that art is anything intended or recognized as such, and that it has only to be "sincere" to be pronounced worthy. So how can one say any art is good or bad? To them, music is even more problematic, because when it stands alone (as opposed to occurring in a song or play) nothing in it seems to refer to the outside world. (Read more...)
Discuss this Article (11 messages)
|
